Cost of Revenue Comparison: 3M Company vs Snap-on Incorporated

3M vs Snap-on: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestamp3M CompanySnap-on Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014164470000001693400000
Thursday, January 1, 2015153830000001704500000
Friday, January 1, 2016150400000001720800000
Sunday, January 1, 2017160010000001862000000
Monday, January 1, 2018166820000001870700000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019171360000001886000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020166050000001844000000
Friday, January 1, 2021187950000002141200000
Saturday, January 1, 2022192320000002311700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023184770000002488500000
Monday, January 1, 2024144470000002329500000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of American industry, 3M Company and Snap-on Incorporated stand as titans in their respective fields. From 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased distinct trajectories in their cost of revenue, a critical financial metric that reflects the direct costs attributable to the production of goods sold by a company.

3M Company, a global conglomerate known for its innovation, saw its cost of revenue fluctuate, peaking in 2022 with a 17% increase from 2014. However, 2024 data shows a significant drop, indicating potential strategic shifts or market challenges. In contrast, Snap-on Incorporated, a leader in professional tools, demonstrated a steady upward trend, with a remarkable 47% increase over the same period, highlighting its robust growth and market penetration.

This comparison not only underscores the dynamic nature of these industries but also offers insights into their operational efficiencies and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025