Comparing SG&A Expenses: Adobe Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc. Trends and Insights

Adobe vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampAdobe Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014221514000060652000
Thursday, January 1, 20152215161000184674000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000444687000
Monday, January 1, 20183365727000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204559000000891175000
Friday, January 1, 20215406000000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 20226187000000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 202367640000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 202472930000001197264000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Adobe Inc. vs. Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial dynamics of industry leaders is crucial. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Adobe Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc. over the past decade. Adobe, a titan in digital media and marketing solutions, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 230% from 2014 to 2024, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. In contrast, Pure Storage, a leader in data storage solutions, has experienced a staggering 1,870% increase in the same period, indicative of its aggressive market penetration and scaling efforts. While Adobe's expenses are significantly higher, Pure Storage's rapid growth trajectory highlights its potential to disrupt the market. This comparison not only underscores the distinct strategies of these companies but also offers insights into their future directions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025