Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Adobe Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc

Adobe vs. Seagate: A Decade of Operational Cost Strategies

__timestampAdobe Inc.Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20142215140000722000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152215161000857000000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000635000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000606000000
Monday, January 1, 20183365727000562000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000453000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204559000000473000000
Friday, January 1, 20215406000000502000000
Saturday, January 1, 20226187000000559000000
Sunday, January 1, 20236764000000491000000
Monday, January 1, 20247293000000460000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: Adobe vs. Seagate in Operational Efficiency

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, operational efficiency is a key determinant of success. Adobe Inc. and Seagate Technology Holdings plc, two titans in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Over the past decade, Adobe has seen a remarkable 229% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and expansion into new markets. In contrast, Seagate's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest decline of about 36% since 2014, indicating a focus on cost control and operational efficiency.

This divergence highlights the different strategic priorities of these companies. Adobe's investment in innovation and market expansion is evident, while Seagate's emphasis on efficiency and cost management underscores its commitment to maintaining profitability in a competitive market. As we look to the future, these strategies will continue to shape their trajectories in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025