Cost Insights: Breaking Down Adobe Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.'s Expenses

Adobe vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of Cost Evolution

__timestampAdobe Inc.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201462208000024129000
Thursday, January 1, 201574431700077552000
Friday, January 1, 2016819908000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 20171010491000252279000
Monday, January 1, 20181194999000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191672720000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201722000000509886000
Friday, January 1, 20211865000000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 20222165000000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 20232354000000855788000
Monday, January 1, 20242358000000809430000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost Insights: Adobe Inc. vs. Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and analysts. Adobe Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc., two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Adobe's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 280%, reflecting its expansive growth and investment in cloud-based solutions. In 2014, Adobe's cost of revenue was around 620 million, but by 2023, it had climbed to nearly 2.35 billion, showcasing a robust upward trajectory.

Conversely, Pure Storage, Inc., a leader in data storage solutions, has seen its cost of revenue grow from a modest 24 million in 2014 to over 855 million in 2023, marking an impressive 3,450% increase. This rapid growth underscores Pure Storage's aggressive market expansion and innovation in storage technology. As we look to 2024, both companies continue to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the digital age.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025