Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: United Airlines Holdings, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Explore cost efficiency in airlines vs. manufacturing.

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014723590000029569000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015709980000025952000000
Friday, January 1, 2016713970000024856000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017796920000027056000000
Monday, January 1, 2018908050000030165000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019963670000030786000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020956670000020385000000
Friday, January 1, 20211042300000023913000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221266330000034315000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231168310000038518000000
Monday, January 1, 20241085130000037643000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Industries

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate efficiency, comparing the cost of revenue between United Airlines Holdings, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a fascinating glimpse into the operational dynamics of two distinct industries. From 2014 to 2023, United Airlines consistently reported a higher cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $38.5 billion in 2023, a 30% increase from its 2014 figures. This reflects the airline industry's capital-intensive nature and its susceptibility to fluctuating fuel prices and labor costs.

Conversely, Stanley Black & Decker, a leader in the tools and storage sector, demonstrated a more stable cost of revenue trajectory, with a notable 62% increase over the same period, reaching around $11.7 billion in 2023. This stability underscores the manufacturing sector's resilience and efficiency in managing production costs. Such insights are crucial for investors and analysts seeking to understand industry-specific challenges and opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025