Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Parker-Hannifin Corporation vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

Parker-Hannifin vs Thomson Reuters: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampParker-Hannifin CorporationThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014101882270009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201596552450008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201688233840008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201791889620008079000000
Monday, January 1, 2018107628410004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019107034840002431000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020102865180002269000000
Friday, January 1, 2021104496800002478000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022113872670002408000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023126358920004095000000
Monday, January 1, 202412801816000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial and information sectors, Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Thomson Reuters Corporation stand as titans. From 2014 to 2023, Parker-Hannifin's cost of revenue surged by approximately 26%, peaking at 12.6 billion in 2023. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced a dramatic decline, with costs plummeting by nearly 75% from 2014 to 2022, before a slight recovery in 2023.

A Decade of Divergence

Parker-Hannifin's consistent growth reflects its robust operational strategies, while Thomson Reuters' fluctuating costs highlight its strategic shifts in the information services sector. Notably, the absence of data for Thomson Reuters in 2024 suggests a potential restructuring or strategic pivot.

Strategic Insights

This comparison underscores the importance of cost management in maintaining competitive advantage. As industries evolve, these insights offer valuable lessons in efficiency and adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025