Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Eaton Corporation plc vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Eaton vs. Stanley: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampEaton Corporation plcStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014156460000007235900000
Thursday, January 1, 2015142920000007099800000
Friday, January 1, 2016134000000007139700000
Sunday, January 1, 2017137560000007969200000
Monday, January 1, 2018145110000009080500000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019143380000009636700000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020124080000009566700000
Friday, January 1, 20211329300000010423000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221386500000012663300000
Sunday, January 1, 20231476300000011683100000
Monday, January 1, 20241537500000010851300000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Eaton vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial manufacturing, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, Eaton Corporation plc and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in managing their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Eaton consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2014 with a 56% lead over Stanley Black & Decker. However, Stanley Black & Decker demonstrated remarkable growth, reducing the gap significantly by 2022, when their cost of revenue surged by 77% compared to 2014. This trend highlights Stanley Black & Decker's aggressive expansion and operational scaling. Meanwhile, Eaton's cost efficiency remained relatively stable, reflecting a more conservative growth strategy. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the strategic priorities and market positioning of these industrial giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025