__timestamp | AMETEK, Inc. | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 462637000 | 2229642000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 448592000 | 2159439000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 462970000 | 2319592000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 533645000 | 2568511000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 584022000 | 2719909000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 610280000 | 2932602000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 515630000 | 3334378000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 603944000 | 3362722000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 644577000 | 3633150000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 677006000 | 4341769000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 696905000 | 1281443000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. AMETEK, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, two industry giants, have demonstrated contrasting approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AMETEK's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 46%, reflecting a steady increase in operational costs. In contrast, Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses surged by nearly 95%, indicating a more aggressive expansion strategy.
While AMETEK maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A costs, Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses nearly doubled, suggesting a focus on scaling operations. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost management. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, effective SG&A management remains a pivotal factor in sustaining competitive advantage.
AMETEK, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Comparison: AMETEK, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
AMETEK, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
AMETEK, Inc. or TransUnion: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
AMETEK, Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated: SG&A Expense Trends
AMETEK, Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
AMETEK, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for AMETEK, Inc. and Masco Corporation
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: AMETEK, Inc. vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AMETEK, Inc. or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.