AMETEK, Inc. or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost strategies of AMETEK and Booz Allen Hamilton.

__timestampAMETEK, Inc.Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144626370002229642000
Thursday, January 1, 20154485920002159439000
Friday, January 1, 20164629700002319592000
Sunday, January 1, 20175336450002568511000
Monday, January 1, 20185840220002719909000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196102800002932602000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205156300003334378000
Friday, January 1, 20216039440003362722000
Saturday, January 1, 20226445770003633150000
Sunday, January 1, 20236770060004341769000
Monday, January 1, 20246969050001281443000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Cost Management: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. AMETEK, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, two industry giants, have demonstrated contrasting approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, AMETEK's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 46%, reflecting a steady increase in operational costs. In contrast, Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses surged by nearly 95%, indicating a more aggressive expansion strategy.

Key Insights

While AMETEK maintained a more conservative growth in SG&A costs, Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses nearly doubled, suggesting a focus on scaling operations. This divergence highlights the strategic choices companies make in balancing growth and cost management. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, effective SG&A management remains a pivotal factor in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025