Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Waste Management, Inc. or Roper Technologies, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Roper vs. Waste Management

__timestampRoper Technologies, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411024260001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511367280001343000000
Friday, January 1, 201612778470001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 201716545520001468000000
Monday, January 1, 201818831000001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919287000001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202021119000001728000000
Friday, January 1, 202123377000001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 202222283000001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 202319159000001926000000
Monday, January 1, 202428815000002264000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Waste Management, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial discipline since 2014. Over the past decade, Roper Technologies has seen a 74% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2021. Meanwhile, Waste Management's SG&A costs rose by 30% during the same period, with a notable dip in 2018.

Roper's strategic investments in technology and innovation have driven its higher SG&A, reflecting its growth ambitions. Conversely, Waste Management's steady cost control aligns with its operational efficiency focus. As of 2023, both companies report similar SG&A expenses, highlighting their distinct yet effective approaches. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to optimize costs while pursuing growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025