Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Equifax Inc. or Masco Corporation

Equifax vs. Masco: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampEquifax Inc.Masco Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20147517000001607000000
Thursday, January 1, 20158843000001339000000
Friday, January 1, 20169482000001403000000
Sunday, January 1, 201710391000001442000000
Monday, January 1, 201812133000001478000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919902000001274000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202013225000001292000000
Friday, January 1, 202113246000001413000000
Saturday, January 1, 202213289000001390000000
Sunday, January 1, 202313857000001481000000
Monday, January 1, 202414505000001468000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Equifax Inc. and Masco Corporation, two industry leaders, have shown contrasting strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Equifax's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 84%, peaking in 2019. Meanwhile, Masco Corporation maintained a more stable trajectory, with a modest 8% increase over the same period. This suggests that while Equifax has been investing heavily in administrative functions, Masco has focused on cost efficiency. The year 2019 marked a significant divergence, with Equifax's expenses surging by 64% compared to the previous year, while Masco's expenses decreased by 14%. This data highlights the strategic choices each company makes in balancing growth and cost management, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025