Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eaton Corporation plc or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

SG&A Cost Optimization: Eaton vs. Booz Allen Hamilton

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationEaton Corporation plc
Wednesday, January 1, 201422296420003810000000
Thursday, January 1, 201521594390003596000000
Friday, January 1, 201623195920003505000000
Sunday, January 1, 201725685110003565000000
Monday, January 1, 201827199090003548000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201929326020003583000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202033343780003075000000
Friday, January 1, 202133627220003256000000
Saturday, January 1, 202236331500003227000000
Sunday, January 1, 202343417690003795000000
Monday, January 1, 202412814430004077000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares Eaton Corporation plc and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Eaton Corporation consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $3.81 billion in 2014, while Booz Allen Hamilton's expenses rose by nearly 95% over the decade, reaching $4.34 billion in 2023. Despite Eaton's higher initial costs, Booz Allen Hamilton's rapid increase suggests a strategic shift or expansion. Notably, Eaton's expenses dipped in 2020, possibly reflecting cost-cutting measures during the pandemic. Missing data for Eaton in 2024 indicates potential reporting delays or strategic changes. Understanding these trends offers insights into each company's operational efficiency and strategic priorities, highlighting the importance of SG&A optimization in sustaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025