Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Cintas Corporation or Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Cintas vs. Curtiss-Wright: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampCintas CorporationCurtiss-Wright Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141302752000426301000
Thursday, January 1, 20151224930000411801000
Friday, January 1, 20161348122000383793000
Sunday, January 1, 20171527380000418544000
Monday, January 1, 20181916792000433110000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191980644000422272000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202071052000412825000
Friday, January 1, 20211929159000443096000
Saturday, January 1, 20222044876000445679000
Sunday, January 1, 20232370704000496812000
Monday, January 1, 20242617783000518857000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Corporations

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Cintas Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation, two industry giants, have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Cintas Corporation's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 101%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and operational scaling. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright Corporation has maintained a more stable SG&A trajectory, with only a 17% increase over the same period.

While Cintas's expenses peaked in 2023, Curtiss-Wright's data for 2024 remains elusive, leaving room for speculation on its future strategy. This comparison highlights the diverse approaches companies take in managing operational costs, with Cintas focusing on growth and Curtiss-Wright on stability. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, understanding these strategies offers valuable insights into corporate financial management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025