EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Waste Management, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

EBITDA Showdown: Waste Management vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201419754000003509000000
Thursday, January 1, 201517419000003342000000
Friday, January 1, 201618102000003713000000
Sunday, January 1, 201721960000003996000000
Monday, January 1, 201817912000004212000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919206000004344000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202020042000004149000000
Friday, January 1, 202123455000004956000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229428000005466000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238027000005592000000
Monday, January 1, 20242863000005128000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Waste Management vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, Waste Management, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their EBITDA growth. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management's EBITDA surged by approximately 59%, reflecting its robust growth strategy and market dominance. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker experienced a decline of around 59%, highlighting challenges in maintaining its operational efficiency.

Key Insights

  • Waste Management: Consistent growth, peaking in 2023 with an EBITDA of over 5.5 billion.
  • Stanley Black & Decker: Faced a downturn, with a significant drop in 2022 and 2023.

This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of business environments and the importance of strategic adaptability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025