Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Diverging Trends

__timestampStanley Black & Decker, Inc.Waste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201425959000001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 201524864000001343000000
Friday, January 1, 201626239000001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 201729801000001468000000
Monday, January 1, 201831717000001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930410000001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030896000001728000000
Friday, January 1, 202132404000001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 202233700000001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 202328293000001926000000
Monday, January 1, 202433105000002264000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A expenses.

A Decade of Trends

From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2022 with a 30% increase from 2015. However, 2023 saw a decline of approximately 16% from the previous year. In contrast, Waste Management's SG&A expenses have steadily increased, with a notable 44% rise from 2014 to 2022.

Insights and Implications

These trends highlight the differing strategic approaches of these companies. While Stanley Black & Decker appears to be optimizing its operational costs, Waste Management is investing more in its administrative functions, possibly to support growth initiatives. Understanding these patterns can provide valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025