__timestamp | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | Trane Technologies plc |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 152469000 | 2503900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 166799000 | 2541100000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 185436000 | 2606500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 273440000 | 2720700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 323587000 | 2903200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 383981000 | 3129800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 348076000 | 2270600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 395533000 | 2446300000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 570191000 | 2545900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 590242000 | 2963200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3580400000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Trane Technologies plc and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. have been at the forefront of this financial discipline since 2014. Over the past decade, Trane Technologies has consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, averaging around $2.66 billion annually. In contrast, J.B. Hunt's expenses have been significantly lower, averaging approximately $339 million per year.
Despite Trane's larger scale, J.B. Hunt has shown a remarkable ability to control its SG&A costs, with a 286% increase from 2014 to 2023, compared to Trane's 18% rise. This suggests that J.B. Hunt's strategic cost management has been more effective, allowing it to allocate resources efficiently. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, these insights into SG&A management could serve as a blueprint for financial success.
Trane Technologies plc vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Trane Technologies plc and Watsco, Inc.
Trane Technologies plc vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs TransUnion
Gross Profit Comparison: Trane Technologies plc and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Trane Technologies plc and Masco Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Trane Technologies plc vs Snap-on Incorporated
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Trane Technologies plc vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Trane Technologies plc and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Trane Technologies plc and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared