The Boeing Company or 3M Company: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Boeing vs. 3M: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestamp3M CompanyThe Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201464690000003767000000
Thursday, January 1, 201561820000003525000000
Friday, January 1, 201661110000003616000000
Sunday, January 1, 201765720000004094000000
Monday, January 1, 201876020000004567000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201970290000003909000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202069290000004817000000
Friday, January 1, 202171970000004157000000
Saturday, January 1, 202290490000004187000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023215260000005168000000
Monday, January 1, 202442210000005021000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Managing SG&A Costs: Boeing vs. 3M

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, 3M and Boeing have showcased contrasting strategies in handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, 3M's SG&A expenses have fluctuated, peaking in 2023 with a staggering 165% increase from 2014. In contrast, Boeing's expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest 37% increase over the same period. This stability suggests Boeing's disciplined approach to cost management, despite the challenges faced by the aerospace industry. Meanwhile, 3M's significant rise in 2023 could indicate strategic investments or restructuring efforts. As we look to 2024, with 3M's expenses dropping by 80% from the previous year, the question remains: will 3M's aggressive cost-cutting yield long-term benefits, or will Boeing's steady approach prove more sustainable?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025