Cost of Revenue Comparison: The Boeing Company vs Cummins Inc.

Boeing vs. Cummins: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampCummins Inc.The Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20141436000000076752000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151416300000082088000000
Friday, January 1, 20161305700000080790000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171533800000076066000000
Monday, January 1, 20181803400000081490000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191759100000072093000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201491700000063843000000
Friday, January 1, 20211832600000059237000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222135500000063078000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232581600000070070000000
Monday, January 1, 20242566300000068508000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: Boeing vs. Cummins

In the ever-evolving landscape of aerospace and automotive industries, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. From 2014 to 2023, The Boeing Company and Cummins Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. Boeing, a titan in aerospace, saw its cost of revenue peak in 2015, followed by a gradual decline, reaching its lowest in 2021. This represents a 28% decrease over the period, reflecting strategic cost management amidst industry challenges.

Conversely, Cummins, a leader in engine manufacturing, experienced a steady rise, with costs surging by 80% from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores Cummins' expansion and increased production capabilities. Notably, 2024 data for Cummins is missing, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison highlights the distinct financial strategies and market responses of these industry giants, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025