Cost of Revenue Comparison: AMETEK, Inc. vs Global Payments Inc.

AMETEK vs Global Payments: Cost of Revenue Trends Unveiled

__timestampAMETEK, Inc.Global Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201425970170001022107000
Thursday, January 1, 201525492800001147639000
Friday, January 1, 201625752200001603532000
Sunday, January 1, 201728514310001928037000
Monday, January 1, 201831863100001095014000
Tuesday, January 1, 201933708970002073803000
Wednesday, January 1, 202029965150003650727000
Friday, January 1, 202136339000003773725000
Saturday, January 1, 202240052610003778617000
Sunday, January 1, 202342124849993727521000
Monday, January 1, 202403760116000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of the financial sector, AMETEK, Inc. and Global Payments Inc. have emerged as key players. Over the past decade, these companies have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue, a critical metric that reflects the direct costs attributable to the production of goods sold by a company.

From 2014 to 2023, AMETEK, Inc. has seen a steady increase in its cost of revenue, growing by approximately 62% from 2014 to 2023. This upward trajectory highlights AMETEK's expanding operations and possibly its strategic investments in production capabilities. In contrast, Global Payments Inc. experienced a more volatile journey, with a significant spike in 2020, where costs surged by over 80% compared to 2014, before stabilizing in subsequent years.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the industry and the strategic decisions that shape the financial health of these corporations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025