Cost of Revenue Comparison: 3M Company vs Northrop Grumman Corporation

3M vs Northrop Grumman: Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestamp3M CompanyNorthrop Grumman Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141644700000018378000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151538300000017884000000
Friday, January 1, 20161504000000018731000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171600100000019849000000
Monday, January 1, 20181668200000023304000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191713600000026582000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201660500000029321000000
Friday, January 1, 20211879500000028399000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221923200000029128000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231847700000032739000000
Monday, January 1, 20241444700000032671000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of American industry, 3M Company and Northrop Grumman Corporation stand as titans in their respective fields. Over the past decade, these companies have navigated the complexities of cost management with varying strategies and outcomes. From 2014 to 2023, Northrop Grumman's cost of revenue surged by approximately 78%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and increased production capabilities. In contrast, 3M's cost of revenue exhibited a more modest growth of around 12%, indicating a steady yet cautious approach to scaling operations.

The year 2023 marked a significant divergence, with Northrop Grumman's costs peaking at over 3.27 times that of 3M's, highlighting its substantial investment in defense and aerospace sectors. However, 2024 data for Northrop Grumman remains elusive, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison underscores the dynamic nature of cost management strategies in the face of global economic shifts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025