Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Automatic Data Processing, Inc. vs Thomson Reuters Corporation

ADP vs. Thomson Reuters: A Decade of SG&A Trends

__timestampAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201427624000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201524969000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201626370000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201727832000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201829715000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201930642000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030030000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202130405000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202232332000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023355140000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20243778900000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: ADP vs. Thomson Reuters

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for evaluating a company's operational efficiency. Over the past decade, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses.

From 2014 to 2023, ADP's SG&A expenses have steadily increased by approximately 36%, reflecting a consistent investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced a dramatic 99% decrease in SG&A expenses, particularly noticeable from 2018 onwards. This sharp decline could indicate strategic cost-cutting measures or a shift in business focus.

Interestingly, the data for 2024 is incomplete for Thomson Reuters, suggesting a potential restructuring or reporting delay. These insights provide a window into the strategic priorities of these industry giants, offering valuable lessons for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025