Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? NetApp, Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation

NetApp vs. Zebra: Who Masters SG&A Costs?

__timestampNetApp, Inc.Zebra Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142179200000351518000
Thursday, January 1, 20152197400000763025000
Friday, January 1, 20162099000000751000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171904000000749000000
Monday, January 1, 20182009000000811000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191935000000826000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201848000000787000000
Friday, January 1, 20212001000000935000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222136000000982000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232094000000915000000
Monday, January 1, 20242136000000981000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, NetApp, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation have showcased distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, NetApp's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2015 and 2022, while Zebra Technologies saw a steady increase, with a notable jump in 2022. Despite NetApp's higher absolute expenses, their trend shows a more stable control, with a decrease of approximately 4% from 2015 to 2020. Zebra, on the other hand, experienced a 180% increase from 2014 to 2022, reflecting their aggressive growth strategy. As of 2023, Zebra's data is incomplete, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic SG&A management in sustaining competitive advantage in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025