Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Eaton Corporation plc or L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Eaton vs. L3Harris: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampEaton Corporation plcL3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143810000000883000000
Thursday, January 1, 201535960000001105000000
Friday, January 1, 201635050000001150000000
Sunday, January 1, 201735650000001182000000
Monday, January 1, 201835480000001242000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935830000002156000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030750000003315000000
Friday, January 1, 202132560000003280000000
Saturday, January 1, 202232270000002998000000
Sunday, January 1, 202337950000001921000000
Monday, January 1, 202440770000003568000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial and defense sectors, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Eaton Corporation plc and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2023, Eaton consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $3.8 billion in 2014 and 2023. However, their expenses showed a slight downward trend, decreasing by about 1% annually. In contrast, L3Harris, starting with a modest $883 million in 2014, saw a significant increase, reaching a peak of $3.3 billion in 2020. This represents a staggering 275% rise over six years, before a reduction to $1.9 billion in 2023.

Eaton's steady approach contrasts with L3Harris's fluctuating expenses, reflecting different strategic priorities. As these companies navigate economic challenges, their SG&A management will remain a key indicator of operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025