__timestamp | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 320213000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 358760000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 375061000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 413404000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 449610000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 497806000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 496122000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 526371000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 603415000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 624266000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 639624000 | 2264000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Waste Management, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. are two giants in their respective industries, each with a unique approach to cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at nearly $1.93 billion in 2022. In contrast, C.H. Robinson's SG&A costs grew steadily, reaching approximately $640 million in 2023. Despite Waste Management's larger absolute expenses, their growth rate was more stable, with a 30% increase over the decade compared to C.H. Robinson's 100% surge. This data suggests that while Waste Management operates on a larger scale, C.H. Robinson's rapid increase in SG&A expenses may indicate aggressive expansion or rising operational costs. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing analysis is needed to draw definitive conclusions.
Waste Management, Inc. or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Waste Management, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Waste Management, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs AECOM Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company
Waste Management, Inc. vs Clean Harbors, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Waste Management, Inc. or Nordson Corporation