__timestamp | U-Haul Holding Company | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 257168000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 238558000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 217216000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 220053000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 219271000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 133435000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 201718000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 207982000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 216557000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 58753000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32654000 | 2264000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving landscape of operational costs, the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Waste Management, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company offer a fascinating glimpse into corporate financial strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Waste Management consistently outpaced U-Haul in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2022 with a staggering 1.94 billion dollars. This represents a 31% increase from their 2015 low. In contrast, U-Haul's SG&A expenses saw a significant decline, dropping by 77% from 2014 to 2023. This sharp decrease in U-Haul's expenses could indicate a strategic shift towards leaner operations. Notably, 2024 data for Waste Management is missing, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As companies navigate the complexities of operational costs, these insights provide valuable lessons in financial management and strategic planning.
Waste Management, Inc. vs U-Haul Holding Company: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Waste Management, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company's Expenses
Waste Management, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Saia, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs AECOM Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Waste Management, Inc. vs Clean Harbors, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Waste Management, Inc. or C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Waste Management, Inc. vs U-Haul Holding Company