__timestamp | AECOM | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 80908000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 113975000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 115088000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 133309000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 135787000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 148123000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 188535000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 155072000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 147309000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 153575000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 160105000 | 2264000000 |
Data in motion
In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. This analysis delves into the SG&A trends of two industry titans: Waste Management, Inc. and AECOM, from 2014 to 2023.
Waste Management, Inc. has consistently demonstrated robust SG&A management, with expenses peaking at approximately $1.93 billion in 2022, marking a 31% increase from 2014. This steady rise reflects the company's strategic investments in operational efficiency and market expansion.
AECOM, on the other hand, experienced more volatility. Starting at $81 million in 2014, their SG&A expenses surged by 133% to reach $188 million in 2020, before stabilizing around $160 million in 2023. This fluctuation highlights AECOM's dynamic approach to managing administrative costs amidst changing market conditions.
While Waste Management, Inc. shows a consistent upward trend, AECOM's fluctuating expenses suggest a more adaptive strategy. The absence of 2024 data for Waste Management, Inc. leaves room for speculation on future trends. As these companies continue to evolve, monitoring their SG&A expenses will provide valuable insights into their operational strategies.
Waste Management, Inc. and AECOM: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Waste Management, Inc. vs AECOM
Waste Management, Inc. vs AECOM: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Saia, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Waste Management, Inc. and AECOM