__timestamp | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Waste Management, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 426301000 | 1481000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 411801000 | 1343000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 383793000 | 1410000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 418544000 | 1468000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 433110000 | 1453000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 422272000 | 1631000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 412825000 | 1728000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 443096000 | 1864000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 445679000 | 1938000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 496812000 | 1926000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 518857000 | 2264000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Waste Management, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.
Over this decade, Waste Management, Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.93 billion in 2022, reflecting a 30% increase from 2014. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright Corporation's SG&A expenses showed a more modest growth, reaching around $497 million in 2023, a 17% rise from 2014. This disparity highlights Waste Management's expansive operational scale compared to Curtiss-Wright's more streamlined approach.
Such insights are invaluable for understanding how these companies allocate resources and manage operational efficiency, offering a window into their strategic priorities and market positioning.
Revenue Showdown: Waste Management, Inc. vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Waste Management, Inc. vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Waste Management, Inc. vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Saia, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs AECOM Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company
Waste Management, Inc. vs Clean Harbors, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends