Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Waste Management, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation

SG&A Expenses: Waste Management vs. Curtiss-Wright (2014-2023)

__timestampCurtiss-Wright CorporationWaste Management, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144263010001481000000
Thursday, January 1, 20154118010001343000000
Friday, January 1, 20163837930001410000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174185440001468000000
Monday, January 1, 20184331100001453000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194222720001631000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204128250001728000000
Friday, January 1, 20214430960001864000000
Saturday, January 1, 20224456790001938000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234968120001926000000
Monday, January 1, 20245188570002264000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Waste Management, Inc. vs. Curtiss-Wright Corporation

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding operational costs is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Waste Management, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.

Over this decade, Waste Management, Inc. consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.93 billion in 2022, reflecting a 30% increase from 2014. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright Corporation's SG&A expenses showed a more modest growth, reaching around $497 million in 2023, a 17% rise from 2014. This disparity highlights Waste Management's expansive operational scale compared to Curtiss-Wright's more streamlined approach.

Such insights are invaluable for understanding how these companies allocate resources and manage operational efficiency, offering a window into their strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025