The Boeing Company or Owens Corning: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Boeing vs. Owens Corning

__timestampOwens CorningThe Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 20144870000003767000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155250000003525000000
Friday, January 1, 20165840000003616000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176200000004094000000
Monday, January 1, 20187000000004567000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196980000003909000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206640000004817000000
Friday, January 1, 20217570000004157000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228030000004187000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238310000005168000000
Monday, January 1, 20245021000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Managing SG&A Costs: Boeing vs. Owens Corning

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Owens Corning and The Boeing Company have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Owens Corning's SG&A expenses increased by approximately 71%, reflecting a steady growth in operational scale. In contrast, Boeing's SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking in 2023 with a 37% increase from 2014, highlighting the challenges faced by the aerospace giant.

While Owens Corning's expenses grew consistently, Boeing's expenses showed volatility, particularly during the pandemic years. This suggests that Owens Corning may have a more stable cost management strategy. However, Boeing's larger scale and industry-specific challenges, such as supply chain disruptions, may account for its higher SG&A costs. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into each company's financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025