Cost of Revenue Comparison: HP Inc. vs Microchip Technology Incorporated

HP vs. Microchip: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampHP Inc.Microchip Technology Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 201484839000000802474000
Thursday, January 1, 201541524000000917472000
Friday, January 1, 201639240000000967870000
Sunday, January 1, 2017424780000001650611000
Monday, January 1, 2018478030000001560100000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019475860000002418200000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020462020000002032100000
Friday, January 1, 2021500700000002059600000
Saturday, January 1, 2022506480000002371300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023422100000002740800000
Monday, January 1, 2024417410000002638700000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, HP Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated stand as titans, each with a unique narrative in cost management. Over the past decade, HP Inc. has consistently maintained a cost of revenue that dwarfs that of Microchip Technology, with figures often exceeding 40 billion annually. This reflects HP's expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, Microchip Technology's cost of revenue, while significantly smaller, has shown a steady upward trend, growing by over 200% from 2014 to 2023. This growth underscores Microchip's strategic expansion and increasing market penetration. The data reveals a fascinating juxtaposition: HP's cost of revenue peaked in 2014, while Microchip's has been on a consistent rise, highlighting different growth strategies. As we look to the future, these trends offer insights into the operational efficiencies and market strategies of these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025