Cost of Revenue Comparison: Caterpillar Inc. vs 3M Company

Caterpillar vs 3M: A Decade of Revenue Dynamics

__timestamp3M CompanyCaterpillar Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141644700000040391000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151538300000034133000000
Friday, January 1, 20161504000000028905000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171600100000031695000000
Monday, January 1, 20181668200000037719000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191713600000037384000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201660500000029671000000
Friday, January 1, 20211879500000035968000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221923200000041915000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231847700000043797000000
Monday, January 1, 20241444700000041485000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of industrial manufacturing, Caterpillar Inc. and 3M Company stand as titans. Over the past decade, these companies have navigated the complexities of global markets, with their cost of revenue reflecting their strategic maneuvers. From 2014 to 2023, Caterpillar's cost of revenue has shown a remarkable 8% increase, peaking in 2023. In contrast, 3M's cost of revenue has fluctuated, with a notable 17% rise from 2016 to 2022, before a slight dip in 2023. This divergence highlights Caterpillar's consistent growth strategy, while 3M's adaptability to market changes is evident. Interestingly, data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As these industry leaders continue to evolve, their financial strategies offer valuable insights into the broader economic landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025