Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Union Pacific Corporation vs XPO Logistics, Inc.

Union Pacific vs. XPO: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampUnion Pacific CorporationXPO Logistics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014143110000001975000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015128370000006538400000
Friday, January 1, 20161167200000012480100000
Sunday, January 1, 20171223100000013101100000
Monday, January 1, 20181329300000014738000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191209400000013982000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201035400000013689000000
Friday, January 1, 20211129000000010812000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022136700000006491000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023135900000006974000000
Monday, January 1, 2024132110000007157000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Union Pacific vs. XPO Logistics

In the ever-evolving landscape of logistics and transportation, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, Union Pacific Corporation and XPO Logistics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Union Pacific, a stalwart in the rail industry, has consistently maintained a cost of revenue around $12.6 billion, with a notable dip in 2020. Meanwhile, XPO Logistics, a leader in supply chain solutions, saw its cost of revenue peak in 2018 at approximately $14.7 billion, before experiencing a significant decline by 2022.

From 2014 to 2023, Union Pacific's cost efficiency improved by roughly 5%, while XPO's fluctuated, reflecting its dynamic business model. This comparison highlights the strategic differences between a traditional rail giant and a modern logistics innovator. As we look to the future, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into the operational strategies of these industry leaders.

Key Insights

  • Union Pacific's cost efficiency improved by 5% over the decade.
  • XPO Logistics experienced a peak in 2018, followed by a decline.
  • Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing strategic adjustments.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025