Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? The Boeing Company or Rockwell Automation, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Boeing vs. Rockwell Automation

__timestampRockwell Automation, Inc.The Boeing Company
Wednesday, January 1, 201415701000003767000000
Thursday, January 1, 201515064000003525000000
Friday, January 1, 201614674000003616000000
Sunday, January 1, 201715915000004094000000
Monday, January 1, 201815990000004567000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201915385000003909000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202014798000004817000000
Friday, January 1, 202116800000004157000000
Saturday, January 1, 202217667000004187000000
Sunday, January 1, 202320237000005168000000
Monday, January 1, 202420026000005021000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of aerospace and automation, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Rockwell Automation, Inc. and The Boeing Company have showcased distinct strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2024, Rockwell Automation's SG&A expenses have seen a modest increase of about 28%, starting from approximately $1.57 billion to $2.00 billion. In contrast, Boeing's expenses have surged by nearly 33%, from $3.77 billion to $5.02 billion. This indicates that while both companies have faced rising costs, Rockwell Automation has maintained a more stable growth trajectory.

The data suggests that Rockwell Automation's approach to cost management might be more effective, especially in a volatile economic landscape. As industries evolve, the ability to control SG&A expenses could be a key differentiator in maintaining competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025