Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Oracle Corporation or Salesforce, Inc.

Oracle vs. Salesforce: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampOracle CorporationSalesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201486050000002764851000
Thursday, January 1, 201587320000003437032000
Friday, January 1, 201690390000003951445000
Sunday, January 1, 201792990000004777000000
Monday, January 1, 201897150000005760000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201997740000007410000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202092750000009634000000
Friday, January 1, 2021893600000011761000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022936400000014453000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231041200000016079000000
Monday, January 1, 2024982200000015411000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A: Oracle vs. Salesforce

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Oracle Corporation and Salesforce, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's SG&A expenses have shown a relatively stable trend, with a modest increase of about 14% over the period. In contrast, Salesforce's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 457%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. Notably, in 2023, Salesforce's SG&A expenses were about 54% higher than Oracle's, highlighting its expansive market approach.

While Oracle maintains a steady course, Salesforce's rapid increase in SG&A expenses suggests a focus on scaling and market penetration. This divergence in strategies offers a fascinating insight into how these tech giants prioritize cost management in their quest for market dominance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025