Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Infosys Limited or Fair Isaac Corporation

SG&A Cost Management: Infosys vs. Fair Isaac

__timestampFair Isaac CorporationInfosys Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20142782030001079000000
Thursday, January 1, 20153000020001176000000
Friday, January 1, 20163289400001020000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173397960001279000000
Monday, January 1, 20183803620001220000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194140860001504000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204209300001223000000
Friday, January 1, 20213962810001391000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223838630001678000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234005650001632000000
Monday, January 1, 2024462834000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology and analytics, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Infosys Limited and Fair Isaac Corporation have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Infosys consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, averaging around 1.32 billion annually, compared to Fair Isaac's 373 million. However, Fair Isaac's expenses grew by approximately 66% over this period, while Infosys saw a 51% increase. This suggests that while Infosys operates on a larger scale, Fair Isaac is rapidly expanding its operational footprint. Notably, 2024 data for Infosys is missing, indicating potential reporting delays or strategic shifts. As these companies continue to evolve, their ability to manage SG&A costs will remain a key indicator of their financial health and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025