Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Adobe Inc. or Super Micro Computer, Inc.

Adobe vs. Super Micro: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampAdobe Inc.Super Micro Computer, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014221514000061029000
Thursday, January 1, 2015221516100073228000
Friday, January 1, 20162487907000100681000
Sunday, January 1, 20172822298000115331000
Monday, January 1, 20183365727000170176000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194124984000218382000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204559000000219078000
Friday, January 1, 20215406000000186222000
Saturday, January 1, 20226187000000192561000
Sunday, January 1, 20236764000000214610000
Monday, January 1, 20247293000000383111000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Adobe Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc. offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Adobe's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 230%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In 2014, Adobe's SG&A costs were around 2.2 billion, climbing to an estimated 7.3 billion by 2024. Meanwhile, Super Micro Computer, Inc. has maintained a more conservative approach, with SG&A expenses increasing by about 530% from 61 million in 2014 to 383 million in 2024. This stark difference highlights Adobe's aggressive market expansion compared to Super Micro's more measured growth. As businesses navigate the post-pandemic economy, these strategies offer valuable insights into balancing growth with cost efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025