| __timestamp | International Business Machines Corporation | Pure Storage, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 92793000000 | 42733000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 81742000000 | 174451000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 79920000000 | 440333000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 79139000000 | 727977000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 79591000000 | 1023019000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 57714000000 | 1359824000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 55179000000 | 1643440000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 57351000000 | 1684179000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 60530000000 | 2180848000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 61860000000 | 2753434000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 62753000000 | 2830621000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving tech industry, revenue generation is a key indicator of a company's market position and growth potential. This analysis pits two giants against each other: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Pure Storage, Inc. Over the past decade, IBM has consistently outperformed Pure Storage in terms of revenue, with figures peaking at approximately $92.8 billion in 2014. However, IBM's revenue has seen a gradual decline, dropping to around $62.8 billion by 2024, marking a 32% decrease.
Conversely, Pure Storage has shown impressive growth, starting from a modest $42.7 million in 2014 and climbing to nearly $2.8 billion in 2024. This represents an exponential increase of over 6,500%. While IBM remains a revenue powerhouse, Pure Storage's rapid growth trajectory highlights its potential to disrupt the market. As the tech landscape continues to shift, these trends offer valuable insights into the future of these industry leaders.
International Business Machines Corporation and PTC Inc.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
International Business Machines Corporation and Western Digital Corporation: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
International Business Machines Corporation and Seagate Technology Holdings plc: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Annual Revenue Comparison: International Business Machines Corporation vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
International Business Machines Corporation vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Comparing Revenue Performance: International Business Machines Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.?
International Business Machines Corporation vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost Insights: Breaking Down International Business Machines Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.'s Expenses
International Business Machines Corporation or SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Gross Profit Trends Compared: International Business Machines Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for International Business Machines Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.
International Business Machines Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?