Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Northrop Grumman Corporation: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison

Comparing EBITDA Trends: Defense vs. Information Services

__timestampNorthrop Grumman CorporationThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201436810000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 201535580000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 201633940000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 201749280000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 201851040000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 201942340000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 202055880000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202187340000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202276840000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202342290000002950000000
Monday, January 1, 20244370000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Thomson Reuters vs. Northrop Grumman

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, the financial performance of industry leaders offers a window into broader economic trends. From 2014 to 2023, Northrop Grumman Corporation and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased contrasting EBITDA trajectories. Northrop Grumman, a titan in the defense sector, saw its EBITDA soar by approximately 137% from 2014 to 2021, peaking in 2021 before a slight decline. Meanwhile, Thomson Reuters, a leader in information services, experienced a more volatile journey, with a notable dip in 2017 and a gradual recovery thereafter. By 2023, Northrop Grumman's EBITDA was nearly 44% higher than Thomson Reuters'. This comparison not only highlights the resilience of the defense industry but also underscores the challenges faced by information services in adapting to a rapidly changing digital landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025