Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Northrop Grumman Corporation

SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters vs Northrop Grumman

__timestampNorthrop Grumman CorporationThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201424050000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201525660000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201625840000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201726550000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201830110000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932900000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202034130000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202135970000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202238730000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023401400000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20243992000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of a company's operational efficiency. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the SG&A expenses of two industry titans: Thomson Reuters Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters: A Rollercoaster Ride

Thomson Reuters, a leader in information services, saw its SG&A expenses peak in 2014, with a staggering 9.2 billion. However, by 2023, these expenses plummeted by over 99%, reflecting significant cost-cutting measures or strategic shifts.

Northrop Grumman: Steady As She Goes

In contrast, Northrop Grumman, a defense and aerospace powerhouse, exhibited a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 67% over the same period. This growth aligns with the company's expanding operations and strategic investments.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and financial trajectories of these two corporations, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025