EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Emerson Electric Co.

EBITDA Trends: Emerson's Stability vs. Thomson's Recovery

__timestampEmerson Electric Co.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201443970000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 201545780000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 201630990000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 201731720000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 201836270000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 201938820000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 202033640000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202140470000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202235020000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202340380000002950000000
Monday, January 1, 20244032000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Emerson Electric

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding financial health is crucial. Over the past decade, Emerson Electric Co. and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased intriguing EBITDA trends. Emerson Electric consistently outperformed, with an average EBITDA of approximately $3.8 billion, peaking in 2015. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced more volatility, with a notable dip in 2018, but rebounded to nearly $3 billion by 2022.

Key Insights

  • Emerson Electric's Stability: Despite fluctuations, Emerson's EBITDA remained robust, highlighting its resilience in the industrial sector.
  • Thomson Reuters' Recovery: After a challenging period, Thomson Reuters demonstrated a strong recovery, emphasizing its adaptability in the information services industry.

These insights provide a window into the strategic maneuvers and market conditions influencing these giants. As we look to the future, monitoring these trends will be essential for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025