Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Canadian National Railway Company

EBITDA Trends: CNR vs. Thomson Reuters (2014-2023)

__timestampCanadian National Railway CompanyThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201456740000004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 201564240000003151000000
Friday, January 1, 201665370000002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 201768390000001495930891
Monday, January 1, 201871240000001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 201979990000001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 202076520000002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202176070000001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202290670000003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202390270000002950000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Decade of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Canadian National Railway

A Financial Journey from 2014 to 2023

In the world of finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial indicator of a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, Canadian National Railway Company (CNR) and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased contrasting EBITDA trajectories. From 2014 to 2023, CNR consistently outperformed, with its EBITDA growing by approximately 59%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced a more volatile journey, with a notable dip in 2017 and 2018, before stabilizing in recent years.

Key Insights

  • CNR's Growth: CNR's EBITDA increased steadily, reflecting robust operational efficiency and strategic growth.
  • Thomson Reuters' Volatility: Despite fluctuations, Thomson Reuters managed a recovery post-2018, indicating resilience in its business model.

This comparative analysis highlights the dynamic nature of these industries, offering valuable insights for investors and stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025