Thomson Reuters Corporation or Roper Technologies, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Roper vs. Thomson Reuters

__timestampRoper Technologies, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201411024260009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511367280008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201612778470008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201716545520008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201818831000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919287000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202021119000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202123377000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202222283000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023191590000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20242881500000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, Roper Technologies, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. Roper Technologies has consistently maintained a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $2.3 billion in 2021, reflecting a strategic investment in growth. In contrast, Thomson Reuters has dramatically reduced its SG&A costs by over 99% from 2014 to 2023, dropping from $9.2 billion to a mere $64 million. This significant reduction could indicate a shift towards leaner operations or divestitures. While Roper's approach suggests a focus on expansion, Thomson Reuters' strategy might be aimed at enhancing operational efficiency. These trends highlight the diverse paths companies can take in managing their operational costs, each with its own set of challenges and opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025