Cost of Revenue Comparison: Howmet Aerospace Inc. vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Cost Dynamics: Howmet vs. Stanley Black & Decker (2014-2023)

__timestampHowmet Aerospace Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014103490000007235900000
Thursday, January 1, 2015101040000007099800000
Friday, January 1, 201698060000007139700000
Sunday, January 1, 2017103570000007969200000
Monday, January 1, 2018113970000009080500000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019112270000009636700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038780000009566700000
Friday, January 1, 2021359600000010423000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022410300000012663300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023477300000011683100000
Monday, January 1, 2024511900000010851300000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Howmet Aerospace vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have showcased intriguing cost dynamics over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Howmet Aerospace's cost of revenue saw a significant decline of approximately 54%, dropping from its peak in 2018. This shift reflects strategic adjustments, possibly in response to market demands or operational efficiencies. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker experienced a robust 61% increase in their cost of revenue, peaking in 2022. This rise could indicate expansion efforts or increased production costs. Notably, 2020 marked a pivotal year for Howmet, with costs plummeting by 65%, likely due to global disruptions. As these industry leaders navigate the complexities of cost management, their financial strategies offer valuable insights into the broader economic trends shaping the manufacturing sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025