Cost of Revenue Comparison: Global Payments Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated

Comparing Cost of Revenue: Global Payments vs Carlisle Companies

__timestampCarlisle Companies IncorporatedGlobal Payments Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201423845000001022107000
Thursday, January 1, 201525365000001147639000
Friday, January 1, 201625181000001603532000
Sunday, January 1, 201729419000001928037000
Monday, January 1, 201833048000001095014000
Tuesday, January 1, 201934399000002073803000
Wednesday, January 1, 202028325000003650727000
Friday, January 1, 202134956000003773725000
Saturday, January 1, 202244345000003778617000
Sunday, January 1, 202330429000003727521000
Monday, January 1, 202431159000003760116000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for assessing a company's efficiency and profitability. This chart provides a fascinating comparison between Global Payments Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Dynamics

Over the past decade, Carlisle Companies Incorporated has consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue compared to Global Payments Inc. Notably, in 2022, Carlisle's cost of revenue peaked at approximately 4.43 billion, marking a 56% increase from 2014. In contrast, Global Payments Inc. saw a significant rise in its cost of revenue, reaching around 3.78 billion in 2022, a staggering 270% increase from its 2014 figures.

Strategic Insights

This data highlights the strategic differences between the two companies. While Carlisle's cost of revenue shows steady growth, Global Payments Inc. demonstrates a more volatile yet rapid increase, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategies in the financial services sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025