Cost of Revenue Comparison: Canadian National Railway Company vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

Comparing Cost of Revenue: CNR vs. WAB (2014-2023)

__timestampCanadian National Railway CompanyWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201471420000002130920000
Thursday, January 1, 201569510000002281845000
Friday, January 1, 201663620000002029647000
Sunday, January 1, 201773660000002841159000
Monday, January 1, 201883590000003151816000
Tuesday, January 1, 201988320000006122400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202080480000005657400000
Friday, January 1, 202184080000005687000000
Saturday, January 1, 202297110000006070000000
Sunday, January 1, 202396770000006733000000
Monday, January 1, 20247021000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of transportation and logistics, the cost of revenue is a critical metric that reflects the efficiency and operational prowess of a company. Over the past decade, Canadian National Railway Company (CNR) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue.

From 2014 to 2023, CNR consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2022 with a 36% increase from 2016. This reflects their expansive operations across North America. Meanwhile, WAB, a leader in rail technology, saw a significant 232% rise in cost of revenue from 2014 to 2023, highlighting their aggressive growth and innovation strategies.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the transportation sector, where operational costs are pivotal in shaping a company's competitive edge. As the industry evolves, monitoring these metrics will be crucial for stakeholders and investors alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025