Comparing Revenue Performance: International Business Machines Corporation or NetApp, Inc.?

IBM vs. NetApp: A Decade of Revenue Trends

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationNetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014927930000006325100000
Thursday, January 1, 2015817420000006122700000
Friday, January 1, 2016799200000005546000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017791390000005519000000
Monday, January 1, 2018795910000005911000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019577140000006146000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020551790000005412000000
Friday, January 1, 2021573510000005744000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022605300000006318000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023618600000006362000000
Monday, January 1, 2024627530000006268000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of Revenue Trends: IBM vs. NetApp

In the ever-evolving tech industry, revenue performance is a key indicator of a company's market position and growth potential. Over the past decade, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and NetApp, Inc. have showcased contrasting revenue trajectories. IBM, a stalwart in the tech world, saw its revenue peak in 2014, only to experience a gradual decline of approximately 32% by 2021. However, recent years have shown a slight recovery, with a 9% increase from 2021 to 2024.

Conversely, NetApp, a leader in data management solutions, maintained a more stable revenue stream. Despite minor fluctuations, NetApp's revenue remained relatively consistent, with a modest 1% increase from 2014 to 2024. This stability highlights NetApp's resilience in a competitive market. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the strategic directions and market adaptability of these tech giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025