Analyzing Cost of Revenue: International Business Machines Corporation and NetApp, Inc.

IBM vs. NetApp: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationNetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014463860000002406000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015410570000002289500000
Friday, January 1, 2016414030000002173000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017421960000002129000000
Monday, January 1, 2018426550000002212000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019261810000002201000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020243140000001789000000
Friday, January 1, 2021258650000001929000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022278420000002098000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023275600000002153000000
Monday, January 1, 2024272020000001835000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Analyzing Cost of Revenue: IBM vs. NetApp

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost dynamics of industry giants like International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and NetApp, Inc. is crucial. From 2014 to 2024, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline of approximately 41%, from $46.4 billion to $27.2 billion. This trend reflects IBM's strategic shift towards more efficient operations and possibly a focus on higher-margin services.

Conversely, NetApp's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease of around 24% over the same period, from $2.4 billion to $1.8 billion. This stability suggests a consistent operational model, potentially driven by its focus on data management solutions.

These trends highlight the contrasting strategies of these tech titans in managing their operational costs, offering valuable insights into their financial health and strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025