3M Company or Thomson Reuters Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

3M vs. Thomson Reuters: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestamp3M CompanyThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201464690000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201561820000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201661110000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201765720000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201876020000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201970290000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202069290000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202171970000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202290490000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232152600000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20244221000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Between 2014 and 2023, 3M Company and Thomson Reuters Corporation have shown contrasting approaches. While 3M's SG&A expenses peaked in 2023, reaching nearly 2.2 times their 2014 levels, Thomson Reuters demonstrated a remarkable reduction, slashing their expenses by over 99% in the same period. This stark difference highlights Thomson Reuters' strategic cost management, especially post-2018, when their expenses dropped significantly. Meanwhile, 3M's expenses showed a steady increase, indicating a different operational strategy. The data suggests that while 3M might be investing heavily in administrative functions, Thomson Reuters is optimizing its operations, potentially freeing up resources for other strategic initiatives. This comparison offers a fascinating insight into how two industry leaders navigate financial management in a dynamic economic landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025