Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Lam Research Corporation or Gartner, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Gartner vs. Lam Research

__timestampGartner, Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014876067000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015962677000591611000
Friday, January 1, 20161089184000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 20171599004000667485000
Monday, January 1, 20181884141000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192103424000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202039087000682479000
Friday, January 1, 20212155724000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 20222480846000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 20232701542000832753000
Monday, January 1, 20242884814000868247000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Gartner, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Gartner's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 208%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Lam Research maintained a more conservative growth of around 36%, indicating a focus on efficiency and cost control.

Gartner's expenses peaked in 2023, while Lam Research showed a steady increase, with a notable dip in 2015. This divergence highlights different corporate strategies: Gartner's expansive approach versus Lam's disciplined cost management. As we look to 2024, Lam's data remains consistent, while Gartner's is yet to be revealed, leaving room for speculation on future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025