Lam Research Corporation or Fair Isaac Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Lam vs. Fair Isaac

__timestampFair Isaac CorporationLam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014278203000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 2015300002000591611000
Friday, January 1, 2016328940000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 2017339796000667485000
Monday, January 1, 2018380362000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019414086000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020420930000682479000
Friday, January 1, 2021396281000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 2022383863000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 2023400565000832753000
Monday, January 1, 2024462834000868247000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Lam Research's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 42%, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, Fair Isaac Corporation has maintained a more conservative growth of around 66% in the same period, indicating a focus on efficiency and cost control.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Lam Research's peak SG&A expenses in 2022, reaching nearly 8.9 billion, highlight its commitment to scaling operations. Meanwhile, Fair Isaac's steady increase, culminating in 4.6 billion in 2024, underscores its strategic restraint. This comparison offers valuable insights into how these industry leaders balance growth and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025