Lam Research Corporation or Corning Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost strategies of Lam Research and Corning.

__timestampCorning IncorporatedLam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141211000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 20151523000000591611000
Friday, January 1, 20161472000000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 20171467000000667485000
Monday, January 1, 20181799000000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191585000000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201747000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 20211827000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 20221898000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 20231843000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 20241931000000868247000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology and manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Lam Research Corporation and Corning Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Corning's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, peaking at approximately $1.93 billion in 2024. In contrast, Lam Research has maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses reaching around $868 million in the same year.

Corning's expenses have grown by about 60% over the decade, reflecting its expansive operational strategies. Meanwhile, Lam Research's expenses have increased by roughly 42%, showcasing a more controlled growth. This comparison highlights the strategic differences in managing operational costs, with Corning focusing on expansion and Lam Research emphasizing efficiency. Understanding these strategies provides valuable insights into corporate financial management in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025