Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Ingersoll Rand Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

SG&A Cost Strategies: Ingersoll Rand vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampIngersoll Rand Inc.Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144760000002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20154270000002486400000
Friday, January 1, 20164143390002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 20174466000002980100000
Monday, January 1, 20184346000003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194364000003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208948000003089600000
Friday, January 1, 202110280000003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 202210958000003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312727000002829300000
Monday, January 1, 202403310500000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of industrial manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Ingersoll Rand Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Ingersoll Rand's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 167%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker maintained a relatively stable SG&A cost structure, with a modest increase of around 9% over the same period. Notably, in 2023, Ingersoll Rand's expenses reached 45% of Stanley Black & Decker's, up from 18% in 2014. This shift highlights Ingersoll Rand's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. As these industry titans continue to evolve, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial health and competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025